Journal
TRANSFUSION MEDICINE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 312-314Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3148.2007.00739.x
Keywords
anti-Wr(a); haemolytic transfusion reaction; Wr(a) antigen
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The Wright (Wr(a)) antigen is found on the red blood cells of approximately I : 1000 Caucasians. Anti-Wr(a) has been reported to be present in I : 25 to I : 100 healthy blood donors and an even higher proportion of hospital patients. Incompatibility due to anti-Wr(a) a might therefore be expected to occur in approximately I in 50 000 blood transfusions. Reports of haemolytic transfusion reactions (HTR) and haemolytic disease of the newborn due to anti-Wr(a) are, however, rare. We report an acute HTR due to anti-Wr(a) in a 58-year-old man with myelodysplastic syndrome associated with rigors, shortness of breath and a significant rise in serum bilirubin from 16 mu mol L-1 pretransfusion to 110 mu mol L-1 immediately afterwards. This was accompanied by the appearance of bilirubin and urobilinogen in his urine and a fall in haemoglobin of nearly 2 g dL(-1) following the transfusion. Anti-Wr(a) a was the only antibody implicated. When tested against the recipients plasma, Wr(a+) panel cells and the transfused unit responsible for the reaction were 2-3 + by indirect antiglobulin test (IAT) and the donation typed as Wr(a+). The recipient had the common Wr(a-) phenotype. The reaction resulted in the patient being admitted to hospital for 2 days. The increasing use of electronic issue may result in more frequent reports of reactions due to anti-Wr ' using current screening cells.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available