4.4 Article

Recovery of genetically defined murine norovirus in tissue culture by using a fowlpox virus expressing T7 RNA polymerase

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages 2091-2100

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/vir.0.82940-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E009956/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust [081624] Funding Source: Medline
  3. BBSRC [BB/E009956/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E009956/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the significant disease burden caused by human norovirus infection, an efficient tissue-culture system for these viruses remains elusive. Murine norovirus (MNV) is an ideal surrogate for the study of norovirus biology, as the virus replicates efficiently in tissue culture and a low-cost animal model is readily available. In this report, a reverse-genetics system for MNV is described, using a fowlpox virus (FWPV) recombinant expressing T7 RNA polymerase to recover genetically defined MNV in tissue culture for the first time. These studies demonstrated that approaches that have proved successful for other members of the family Caliciviridae failed to lead to recovery of MNV. This was due to our observation that vaccinia virus infection had a negative effect on MNV replication. In contrast, FWPV infection had no deleterious effect and allowed the recovery of infectious MNV from cells previously transfected with MNV cDNA constructs. These studies also indicated that the nature of the 3'-terminal nucleoticle is critical for efficient virus recovery and that inclusion of a hepatitis delta virus ribozyme at the 3' end can increase the efficiency with which virus is recovered. This system now allows the recovery of genetically defined noroviruses and will facilitate the analysis of the effects of genetic variation on norovirus pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available