4.6 Article

The pharmacology of multiple regimens of agalsidase alfa enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease

Journal

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 504-509

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318133fb1b

Keywords

Fabry disease; agalsidase alfa; enzyme replacement therapy; pharmacodynamics; dose response

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This 10-week study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics of varying doses of agalsidase alfa and evaluate the effect of dose and dosing frequency on plasma Gb(3) levels. Methods: Eighteen adult male Fabry patients, naive to enzyme replacement therapy, were randomized to one of five regimens: 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg/kg weekly; 0.2 mg/kg every other week (the approved dose); or 0.4 mg/kg every other week. Intravenous infusion rate was 0.1 mg/kg per 20 minutes. Plasma Gb(3) levels were assessed at baseline and periodically during the study. Results: The mean half-life was 56-76 minutes, and the mean volume of distribution at steady state was 17%-18% of body weight, with no significant association between dose and half-life, clearance, or volume of distribution at steady state. The area under the curve was linearly proportional to the dose from 0.1 to 0.4 mg/kg. Baseline average plasma Gb(3) was 9.12 +/- 2.61 nmol/mL and after 10 weeks of treatment was significantly reduced by about 50% in each group with no statistically significant differences between groups. Conclusions: Reduction of plasma Gb(3) levels was independent of dose or dose frequency in the range tested. These observations, coupled with the clinical trial experience of both agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta, indicate that the standard dose of agalsidase alfa is sufficient to maximally reduce plasma Gb(3). However, because plasma Gb(3) is not a validated surrogate of disease severity in Fabry disease, further clinical study will be required to determine the optimal dosing regimen for providing maximal clinical benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available