4.7 Article

Thickness and refractive index of DPPC and DPPE monolayers by multiple-beam interferometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 406, Issue 19, Pages 4725-4733

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-7866-9

Keywords

DPPC; DPPE; Refractive index; Thickness; Optical properties; Supported lipid monolayer; Phospholipid monolayer; Mica; Multiple-beam interferometry; AFM; X-ray; SFA

Funding

  1. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  3. University of California RISE program (Project ANSWER)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thickness and refractive index of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidyl choline (DPPC) and 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DPPE) monolayers Langmuir--Blodgett (LB) deposited on mica were measured in dry air and bulk water using multiple-beam interferometry (MBI). Measurements of thickness using atomic force microscopy (AFM) of identical monolayers, and X-ray reflectivity (XRR) of the monolayers on quartz were taken for comparison. The measurement of the properties of solid-supported monolayers in dry air allows lipid optical properties to be determined free from solvent effects. The thickness and refractive index measured by MBI were 25.5 +/- 0.6 and 1.485 +/- 0.007 for DPPE monolayers, and 23.9 +/- 0.5 and 1.478 +/- 0.006 for DPPC monolayers in dry air. These thicknesses are consistent with the other techniques used in this work as well as other measurements in the literature. The refractive indices of solid-supported lipid monolayers have not been previously measured. The values are higher than previous measurements on black lipid films done by reflectometry, which is attributed to increased lipid packing density and the absence of hydrocarbon solvents. Applying water to the monolayers had no measurable effect on their properties, indicating that any change in hydration was below detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available