4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Coronary flow obstruction in percutaneous aortic valve replacement. An in vitro study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 291-294

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.04.033

Keywords

aortic valve; replacement; percutaneous; coronary artery flow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Coronary flow obstruction is a serious complication reported in percutaneous aortic valve replacement. In an in vitro study of porcine hearts, the effects of valved stent implantation on coronary artery flow were studied with the native valve's leaflets intact and excised. Methods: The right and Left main coronary arteries of porcine hearts were dissected 20 mm distal. to the aortic root and directed into lengths of latex tubing leading to collection flasks. The ascending aorta was cut proximal to the brachiocephatic trunk, cannulated, and attached to a constant-head water supply. After steady flow was achieved, the flow rate from each coronary artery was measured. In Group A (n = 10), a tubular pericardial valve sutured into a cylindrical, cobalt-nickel stent was deployed orthotopically using a valvuloplasty, balloon catheter. In Group B (n = 10), the native leaflets were removed before similar valve deployment. Coronary flow measurements were repeated post-implantation. Results: In Group A, valve implantation resulted in a significant decrease in both left and right coronary flows. In Group B, no significant change in either right or left coronary flow was found after valve placement. Conclusion: Implantation of a percutaneous valved stent in the orthotopic position with the native valve in place causes coronary ostial obstruction. This problem highlights the need for modified stents that are designed for implantation in patients with non-retracted, fibrotic, or calcified leaflets. (C) 2007 European Association for Cardio-horacic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available