4.5 Article

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K contributes to angiotensin II stimulation of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA translation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 293, Issue 2, Pages F607-F615

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00497.2006

Keywords

ANG II; VEGF; signal transduction; RNA-binding protein

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-50190, R01 DK-55815] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM-45134] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [R01-KD-45978] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ANG II rapidly increases VEGF synthesis in proximal tubular epithelial cells through mRNA translation. The role of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K ( hnRNP K) in ANG II regulation of VEGF mRNA translation initiation was examined. ANG II activated hnRNP K as judged by binding to poly( C)- and poly( U)- agarose. ANG II increased hnRNP K binding to VEGF mRNA at the same time as it stimulated its translation, suggesting that hnRNP K contributes to VEGF mRNA translation. Inhibition of hnRNP K expression by RNA interference significantly reduced ANG II stimulation of VEGF synthesis. ANG II increased hnRNP K phosphorylation on both tyrosine and serine residues with distinct time courses; only Ser302 phosphorylation paralleled binding to VEGF mRNA. Src inhibition using PP2 or RNA interference inhibited PKC delta activity and prevented hnRNP K phosphorylation on both tyrosine and serine residues and its binding to VEGF mRNA. Under these conditions, ANG II- induced VEGF synthesis was inhibited. ANG II treatment induced redistribution of both VEGF mRNA and hnRNP K protein from light to heavy polysomal fractions, suggesting increased binding of hnRNP K to VEGF mRNA that is targeted for increased translation. This study shows that hnRNP K augments efficiency of VEGF mRNA translation stimulated by ANG II.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available