4.4 Article

TGF-β, Smad3 and the process of progressive fibrosis

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 661-664

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST0350661

Keywords

inflammation; myofibroblast; pulmonary fibrosis; Smad3; tissue repair; transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transient adencivinds-mriediated gene transfer of active TGF-beta 1 (transforming growth factor-beta 1) induces severe and progressive fibrosis in rodent lung without apparent inflammation. Alternatively, transfer of IL-1 beta (interleukin 1 beta) induces marked tissue injury and inflammation, which develops into progressive fibrosis, associated with an increase in TGF1 beta concentrations in lung fluid and tissue. Both vector treatments induce a fibrotic response involving myofibroblasts and progressive matrix deposition starting at the peri-bronchial site of expression and extending over days to involve the entire lung and pleural surface. Administration of the TGF-beta 1 vector to the pleural space induces progressive pleural fibrosis, which minimally extends into the lung parenchyma. The mechanisms involved in progressive fibrosis need to account for the limitation of fibrosis to specific organs (lung fibrosis and not liver fibrosis or vice versa) and the lack of effect of anti-inflammatofy treatments in regulating progressive fibrosis. TGF-beta 1 is a key cytokine in the process of fibrogenesis, using intracellular signalling pathways involving the ALKS receptor and signalling molecules Smac2 and Smad3. Transient gene transfer of either TGF beta 1 or IL-1 beta to Smad3-null mouse lung provides little evidence of progressive fibrosis and no fibrogenesis-associated genes are induced. These results suggest that mechanisms of progressive fibrosis involve factors presented within the context of the matrix that define the microenvironment for progressive matrix deposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available