4.7 Article

Combining δ13C and δ18O analyses to unravel competition, CO2 and O3 effects on the physiological performance of different-aged trees

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 1023-1034

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01696.x

Keywords

elevated carbon dioxide (CO2); elevated ozone; (O-3); Fagus sylvatica; Picea abies; cellulose; photosynthetic; capacity (Amax); semi-quantitative model approach; stable; isotope ratios; stomatal conductance for water vapour (gl).

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combined delta C-13 and delta O-18 analyses of leaf material were used to infer changes in photosynthetic capacity (A(max)) and stomatal conductance (g(l)) in Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies trees growing under natural and controlled conditions. Correlation between g(l) and delta O-18 in leaf cellulose (delta O-18(cel)) allowed us to apply a semi-quantitative model to infer g(l) from delta O-18(cel) and also interpret variation in delta C-13 as reflecting variation in A(max). Extraction of leaf cellulose was necessary, because delta O-18 from leaf organic matter (delta O-18(LOM)) and delta O-18(cel) was not reliably correlated. In juvenile trees, the model predicted elevated carbon dioxide (CO2) to reduce A(max) in both species, whereas ozone (O-3) only affected beech by reducing CO2 uptake via lowered g(l). In adult trees, A(max) declined with decreasing light level as g(l) was unchanged. O-3 did not significantly affect isotopic signatures in leaves of adult trees, reflecting the higher O-3 susceptibility of juvenile trees under controlled conditions. The isotopic analysis compared favourably to the performance of leaf gas exchange, underlining that the semi-quantitative model approach provides a robust way to gather time-integrated information on photosynthetic performance of trees under multi-faced ecological scenarios, in particular when information needed for quantitative modelling is only scarcely available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available