4.4 Article

The invasive front in endometrial carcinoma:: higher proliferation and associated derailment of cell cycle regulators

Journal

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 1232-1238

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.01.008

Keywords

endometrium; cancer; immunohistochernistry; invasive front; cell cycle; hypoxia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to explore whether expression of proliferation and hypoxia-related proteins differs in the central parts and the invasive front in endometrial carcinomas. Proliferation-associated proteins Ki67 and cyclin A; cell cycle regulators p16, p21, p53, cyclin D1, cyclin E, and cdk2; and hypoxia-inducible factor la and its downstream factors glucose transporter 1, carbonic anhydrase IX, and vascular endothelial growth factor were immunohistochemically stained in paraffin-embedded specimens from endometrioid (n = 33), mucinous (n = 1), and serous (n = 5) endometrial carcinomas. The percentages of positive cells at the invasive front and central tumor parts were scored and compared. Ki67 (P < .001), cyclin E (P = .018), p16 (P = .003), and cdk2 (.001) were expressed higher at the invasive front than centrally (Wilcoxon signed ranks test). Higher expression of these antigens at the invasive front was seen in 31 of 38 cases for Ki67, in 16 of 39 cases for cyclin E, in 15 of 39 cases for cdk2, and in 11 of 39 cases for p16. The other cell cycle proteins and the hypoxia-related factors did not show significant differences in expression between the central parts and the invasive front. Endometrial carcinomas clearly show an invasive front that is characterized by higher proliferation and progressive derailment of the cell cycle regulators cyclin E, p16, and cdk2, but not by an increased hypoxic response. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available