4.7 Article

Simultaneous development of both competitive and noncompetitive immunoassays for 2,2′,4,4′-tetrabromodiphenyl ether using phage-displayed peptides

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 405, Issue 29, Pages 9579-9583

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-7364-5

Keywords

2,2 ',4,4 '-Tetrabromodiphenyl ether; Phage-displayed peptide; Competitive phage ELISA; Noncompetitive phage ELISA; Flame retardant

Funding

  1. National Natural and Science Foundation (NNSF) of China [20977111]
  2. Chinese University Scientific Fund
  3. Special Project on the Integration of Industry, Education and Research of Guangdong Province [2012B091100281]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twenty-five phages that selectively bind to a monoclonal antibody (Mab) 1H2 specific to 2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE47) in the absence or presence of BDE47 have been selected from phageaEurodisplay libraries containing cyclic 7-mer, linear 7-mer, and linear 12-mer randomized peptides. Competitive and noncompetitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for BDE47 were developed by using a clone C7-1 specific to the BDE47-free Mab 1H2 and a clone XC7-8 specific to the BDE47-bound Mab 1H2, respectively. The half-maximum signal inhibition concentration (IC50) of the competitive phage ELISA and the half-maximum signal enhancement concentration (EC50) of the noncompetitive phage ELISA for BDE47 were 6.8 ng mL(-1) and 4.2 ng mL(-1), respectively. The noncompetitive phage ELISA showed higher cross-reactivity with BDE28, BDE99, and BDE100 than the competitive one, ranging between 1.3 and 6.5 % versus 0.3 and 0.8 %. Recoveries of the competitive and the noncompetitive phage ELISAs for BDE47 in sewage sludge and fillet samples were 96-124 % and 97-120 %, respectively. The results of the two types of phage ELISAs for BDE47 in the real-world samples agreed well with a gas chromatography/electron capture detector-ion trap mass spectrometer method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available