4.7 Article

Multilocus phylogenetic analyses within Blumeria graminis, a powdery mildew fungus of cereals

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 741-751

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.01.007

Keywords

beta-tubulin; chitin synthase 1; Erysiphaceae; Poaceae; rDNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blumeria graminis, a powdery mildew fungus, is an important plant pathogen that causes serious damage to a variety of cereal crops. In spite of the importance of the pathogen, information on phylogenetic structure within B. graminis is scarce. In this study we conducted phylogenetic analyses of B. graminis based on the DNA sequences of four different DNA regions (ITS, 28S rDNA, chitin synthase I, and beta-tubulin). The analyses revealed that the protein-coding regions have higher amounts of phylogenetic signals than rDNA regions and are useful for phylogenetic analyses of B. graminis. The present phylogenetic analyses revealed nine distinct groups in the B. graminis isolates used in this study, a result which was commonly supported by all trees constructed from the four DNA regions. Isolates frorn a single host genus belonged to a single group except for isolates from Lolium and Bromus, in which the isolates were split into two and three groups, respectively. Isolates from Agropyron, Secale and Triticum formed a distinct clade (Triticum clade) with identical or similar DNA sequences. The Hordeum clade was a sister of the Triticum clade, and Poa and Arena clades were distantly related to the Triticum and Hordeum clades. This phylogenetic relationship of B. graminis is well concordant with the level of reproductive isolation between formae speciales and also with phylogeny inferred from a cytological Study. Shimodaira-Hasegawa and Templeton tests using sequences of four different DNA regions significantly rejected the tree topology of plants. Therefore, possibility of co-speciation between B. graminis and its host plants was obscure in this study. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available