4.7 Article

Ultrasound-assisted liquid-phase microextraction based on a nanostructured supramolecular solvent

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 405, Issue 12, Pages 4235-4243

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-6810-8

Keywords

Ultrasonically enhanced supramolecular solvent microextraction; Nano-structured solvent; Phthalates; Water samples; Cosmetics

Funding

  1. Tarbiat Modares University
  2. National Elites Foundation, Iran

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel ultrasonically enhanced supramolecular solvent microextraction (USESSM) then high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection have been used for extraction and determination of phthalates in water and cosmetics. Coacervates consisting of decanoic acid-based nano-structured aggregates, specifically reverse micelles, have been used the first time as solvents for ultrasound-assisted emulsification microextraction (USAEME). Sonication accelerated mass transfer of the target analytes into the nano-structured solvent from the aqueous sample, thus reducing extraction time. Several conditions affecting extraction efficiency, for example the concentrations of major components of the supramolecular solvent (tetrahydrofuran and decanoic acid), sample solution pH, salt addition, and ultrasonication time, were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, preconcentration of the analytes ranged from 176 to 412-fold and the linear range was 0.5-100 mu g L-1, with correlation coefficients (R (2)) a parts per thousand yenaEuro parts per thousand 0.9984. The detection sensitivity of the method was excellent, with limits of detection (LOD, S/N = 3) in the range 0.10-0.70 mu g L-1 and precision in the range 4.1-11.7 % (RSD, n = 5). This method was successfully used for analysis of phthalates in water and cosmetics, with good recovery of spiked phthalates (91.0-108.5 %).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available