4.7 Article

Inhibitory control in high-functioning autism: Decreased activation and underconnectivity in inhibition networks

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 198-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.08.004

Keywords

autism; factor analysis; fMRI; functional connectivity; inhibitory control; response inhibition; underconnectivity

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U19 HD035469, U19 HD035469-06, HD35469, P01 HD035469, U19 HD035469-08, U19 HD035469-10, U19 HD035469-09, U19 HD035469-07] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Inhibiting prepotent responses is critical to optimal cognitive and behavioral function across many domains. Several behavioral studies have investigated response inhibition in autism, and the findings varied according to the components involved in inhibition. There has been only one published functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study so far on inhibition in autism, which found greater activation in participants with autism than control participants. Methods: This study investigated the neural basis of response inhibition in 12 high-functioning adults with autism and 12 age- and intelligence quotient (IQ)-matched control participants during a simple response inhibition task and an inhibition task involving working memory. Results: In both inhibition tasks, the participants with autism showed less brain activation than control participants in areas often found to be active in response inhibition tasks, namely the anterior cingulate cortex. In the more demanding inhibition condition, involving working memory, the participants with autism showed more activation than control participants in the premotor areas. In addition to the activation differences, the participants with autism showed lower levels of synchronization between the inhibition network (anterior cingulate gyrus, middle cingulate gyrus, and insula) and the right middle and inferior frontal and right inferior parietal regions. Conclusions: The results indicate that the inhibition circuitry in the autism group is activated atypically and is less synchronized, leaving inhibition to be accomplished by strategic control rather than automatically. At the behavioral level, there was no difference between the groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available