4.6 Article

Wide-field survey of globular clusters in M31. I. A catalog of new clusters

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages 706-720

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/519556

Keywords

galaxies : individual (M31, NGC 224); galaxies : spiral; galaxies : star clusters; Local Group

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [07-9-300-00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [과06A1102] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the result of a wide-field survey of globular clusters (GCs) in M31 covering a 3 degrees x 3 degrees field centered on M31. We have searched for GCs on CCD images taken with Washington CMT1 filters at the KPNO 0.9 m telescope using the following steps: (1) inspection of morphological parameters given by the SExtractor package such as stellarity, full width at half-maximum, and ellipticity; (2) consulting the spectral types and radial velocities obtained from spectra taken with the Hydra spectrograph at the WIYN 3.5 m telescope; and (3) visual inspection of the images of each object. We have found 1164 GCs and GC candidates, of which 605 are newly found GCs and GC candidates and 559 are previously known GCs. Among the new objects there are 113 genuine GCs, 258 probable GCs and 234 possible GCs, according to our classification criteria. Among the known objects there are 383 genuine GCs, 109 probable GCs, and 67 possible GCs. In total there are 496 genuine GCs, 367 probable GCs, and 301 possible GCs. Most of these newly found GCs have TI magnitudes of 17.5-19.5 mnag [ 17.9 < V < 19.9 mag assuming (C - T-1)approximate to 1.5], and (C-T-1) colors in the range 1-2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available