4.7 Article

Improving selectivity in gas chromatography by using chemically modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes as stationary phase

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 403, Issue 4, Pages 1157-1165

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5606-y

Keywords

Functionalized carbon nanotubes; gas chromatography; packed column; paint thinner; selectivity; stationary phase

Funding

  1. FAR (Fondo Ateneo per la Ricerca) of the University of Pavia (Italy)
  2. Euroanalysis Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amino-terminated alkyl MWCNTs (MWCNTs-R-NH2), synthesized by chemical modification of the nanotube skeleton by nucleophilic substitution with 2,2'-(ethylenedioxy)diethylamine, were successfully used as stationary phases for gas chromatographic separation of esters and chloroaromatics. The presence of alkyl chains with polar embedded groups made the functionalized MWCNTs (f-MWCNTs) a mixed-mode GC separation material able to interact in different ways with the analytes. Compared with non-functionalized MWCNTs (nf-MWCNTs), MWCNTs-R-NH2 had higher selectivity, enhanced resolution, and optimum retention behaviour, and they were proved to perform better than the commercial stationary phase Porapak QS (PQS), claimed to be suitable for similar applications. The so-prepared stationary phase was used for analysis of a synthetic mixture containing different classes of analytes, viz. esters, ketones, alcohols, alkanes, and aromatic hydrocarbons, and finally used for investigation of similar real matrices. In particular, the constituents of a commercial paint thinner were determined by direct injection of the sample, with good reproducibility (inter-day precision RSDs from 5 to 19%). Two unknown samples of commercial white spirit were also analysed for determination of the aromatic hydrocarbon content, and their composition was profiled on the basis of the different compounds identified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available