4.7 Review

QconCATs: design and expression of concatenated protein standards for multiplexed protein quantification

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 404, Issue 4, Pages 977-989

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6230-1

Keywords

Quantification concatamer; Multiplexed quantification; Absolute quantification; Nuclear factor kappa B

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Systems Approach to Biological Research (SABR) [BB/F005938/1]
  2. BBSRC LOLA [BB/G009112/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/F005938/1, BB/F005938/2, BB/G009112/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C007433/1, BB/F005938/2, BB/G009112/1, BB/F005938/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systems biology requires knowledge of the absolute amounts of proteins in order to model biological processes and simulate the effects of changes in specific model parameters. Quantification concatamers (QconCATs) are established as a method to provide multiplexed absolute peptide standards for a set of target proteins in isotope dilution standard experiments. Two or more quantotypic peptides representing each of the target proteins are concatenated into a designer gene that is metabolically labelled with stable isotopes in Escherichia coli or other cellular or cell-free systems. Co-digestion of a known amount of QconCAT with the target proteins generates a set of labelled reference peptide standards for the unlabelled analyte counterparts, and by using an appropriate mass spectrometry platform, comparison of the intensities of the peptide ratios delivers absolute quantification of the encoded peptides and in turn the target proteins for which they are surrogates. In this review, we discuss the criteria and difficulties associated with surrogate peptide selection and provide examples in the design of QconCATs for quantification of the proteins of the nuclear factor kappa B pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available