4.7 Article

A quick, convenient and economical method for the reliable determination of methylglyoxal in millimolar concentrations: the N-acetyl-L-cysteine assay

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 403, Issue 9, Pages 2577-2581

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6086-4

Keywords

Methylglyoxal; Glyoxalase I; 2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine; N-acetyl-L-cysteine; Spectrophotometric measurements

Funding

  1. NHMRC [436797, 606543, 1046227]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The determination of methylglyoxal (MG) concentrations in vivo is gaining increasing importance as high levels of MG are linked to various health impairments including complications of diabetes. In order to standardize the measurements of MG in body fluids, it is necessary to precisely determine the concentration of MG stock solutions used as analytical standards. The gold standard method for the determination of MG concentration in the millimolar range is an enzyme-catalyzed endpoint assay based on the glyoxalase I catalyzed formation of S-lactoylglutathione. However, as this assay used purified glyoxalase I enzyme, it is quite expensive. Another method uses a derivation reaction with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine, but this substance is explosive and needs special handling and storage. In addition, precipitation of the product methylglyoxal-bis-2,4-dinitrophenylhydrozone during the reaction limits the reliability of this method. In this study, we have evaluated a new method of MG determination based on the previously published fast reaction between MG and N-acetyl-l-cysteine at room temperature which yields an easily detectable condensation product, N-alpha-acetyl-S-(1-hydroxy-2-oxo-prop-1-yl)cysteine. When comparing these three different assays for the measurement of MG concentrations, we find that the N-acetyl-l-cysteine assay is the most favorable, providing an economical and robust assay without the need for the use of hazardous or expensive reagents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available