4.5 Article

Differential expression of sarcolipin protein during muscle development and cardiac pathophysiology

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR CARDIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 215-222

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2007.05.009

Keywords

sarcolipin; SERCA2a; phospholamban; atria; skeletal muscle; heart failure; development

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL088555, R01 HL064140, R01 HL064140-09, HL-64140, R01 HL088555-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sarcolipin (SLN) is a small molecular weight sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) membrane protein expressed both in cardiac and skeletal muscle tissues. Recent studies using transgenic mouse models have demonstrated that SLN is an important regulator of cardiac SR Ca2+ ATPase 2a (SERCA2a). However, there is a paucity of information regarding the SLN protein expression in small versus larger mammals and its regulation during development and cardiac pathophysiology. Therefore, the major goal of this study was to generate an SLN specific antibody and perform detailed analyses of SLN protein expression during muscle development and in the diseased myocardium. The important findings of the present study are: (i) in small mammals, SLN expression is predominant in the atria but low in the ventricle and in skeletal muscle tissues, whereas in large mammals, SLN is quite abundant in skeletal muscle tissues than the atria, (ii) SLN and SERCA2a are co-expressed in all striated muscle tissues studied except ventricle and co-ordinately regulated during muscle development and (iii) SLN protein levels are similar to 3 fold upregulated in the atria of heart failure dogs and similar to 30% decreased in the atria of hearts prone to myocardial ischemia. In addition we found that in the phospholamban null atria, SLN protein levels are upregulated. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available