4.7 Article

Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: Prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 244, Issue 2, Pages 381-388

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2442060461

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U01 CA74680, 5 U01 CA74696, U24 CA78146-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To prospectively determine cancer yield, callback and biopsy rates, and positive predictive value (PPV) of mammography, magnetic resonance ( MR) imaging, and ultrasonography (US) in women at high risk for breast cancer. Materials and Methods: The study was approved by the institutional review board and was HIPAA compliant, and informed consent was obtained. We conducted a prospective pilot study of screening mammography, MR, and US in asymptomatic women 25 years of age or older who were genetically at high risk, defined as BRCA1/ BRCA2 carriers or with at least a 20% probability of carrying a BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutation. All imaging modalities were performed within 90 days of each other. Data were analyzed by using exact confidence intervals (CIs) and the McNemar test. Results: A total of 195 women were enrolled in this study over a 6- month period, and 171 completed all study examinations (mammography, US, and MR). Average age of the 171 participants was 46 years +/- 10.2 (standard deviation). Sixteen biopsies were performed and six cancers were detected, for an overall 3.5% cancer yield. MR enabled detection of all six cancers; mammography, two; and US, one. The diagnostic yields for each test were 3.5% for MR, 0.6% for US, and 1.2% for mammography. MR, US, and mammography findings prompted biopsy in 8.2%, 2.3%, and 2.3% of patients, respectively. None of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant. The PPV of biopsies performed as a result of MR was 43%. Conclusion: Screening MR imaging had a higher biopsy rate but helped detect more cancers than either mammography or US. US had the highest false-negative rate compared with mammography and MR, enabling detection of only one in six cancers in high- risk women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available