4.7 Article

Improved spatial resolution in the imaging of biological tissue using desorption electrospray ionization

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 404, Issue 2, Pages 389-398

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-6173-6

Keywords

Ambient ionization; Tissue imaging; Electrospray ionization; Imaging mass spectrometry; High-resolution imaging; Morphologically friendly solvents; Histology; Ovulation; Corpus luteum

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE NSF 0848650]
  2. Division Of Chemistry
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0848650] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Desorption electrospray ionization imaging allows biomarker discovery and disease diagnosis through chemical characterization of biological samples in their native environment. Optimization of experimental parameters including emitter capillary size, solvent composition, solvent flow rate, mass spectrometry scan-rate and step-size is shown here to improve the resolution available in the study of biological tissue from 180 mu m to about 35 mu m using an unmodified commercial mass spectrometer. Mouse brain tissue was used to optimize and measure resolution based on known morphological features and their known relationships to major phospholipid components. Features of approximately 35 mu m were resolved and correlations drawn between features in grey matter (principally PS (18:0/22:6), m/z 834) and in white matter (principally ST (24:1), m/z 888). The improved spatial resolution allowed characterization of the temporal changes in lipid profiles occurring within mouse ovaries during the ovulatory cycle. An increase in the production of phosphatidylinositol (PI 38:4) m/z 885 and associated fatty acids such as arachidonic acid (FA 20:4) m/z 303 and adrenic acid (FA 22:4) m/z 331was seen with the postovulatory formation of the corpus luteum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available