4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Rapid determination of anilines in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop prior to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 403, Issue 3, Pages 877-884

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-012-5907-9

Keywords

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Floating organic droplet; Anilines; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; Water sample

Funding

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [21037001]
  2. National Key Project for Basic Research of China [2008BAC32B06-1]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2009AA06Z319]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid, sensitive and environmentally friendly method for the analysis of 14 anilines in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop (DLLME-SFO) prior to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was developed and optimized. In the proposed method, cyclohexane was used as the extraction solvent as its toxicity was much lower than that of the solvent usually used in dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME). In the optimized conditions, the method exhibited good analytical performance. Based on a signal-to-noise ratio of 3, limits of detection for anilines were in the range of 0.07 to 0.29 mu g L-1, and the linear range was 0.5-200 mu g L-1 with regression coefficients (r (2)) higher than 0.9977. It was efficient for qualitative and quantitative analysis of anilines in water samples. The relative standard deviations varied from 2.9 to 8.6 % depending on different compounds indicating good precision. Tap water and river water were selected for evaluating the application to real water samples. The relative recoveries of anilines for the two real samples spiked with 10 mu g L-1 anilines were in the scope of 78.2-114.6 % and 77.3-115.6 %, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available