4.7 Article

Fragmentation methods on the balance: unambiguous top-down mass spectrometric characterization of oxaliplatin-ubiquitin binding sites

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 402, Issue 8, Pages 2655-2662

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5523-0

Keywords

Anticancer metallodrugs; Tandem mass spectrometry; Electron transfer dissociation; Oxaliplatin; Ubiquitin

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I496-B11]
  2. Hochschuljubil umsstiftung Vienna
  3. [COST D39]
  4. [CM0902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between oxaliplatin and the model protein ubiquitin (Ub) was investigated in a top-down approach by means of high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) using diverse tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) techniques, including collision-induced dissociation (CID), higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD), and electron transfer dissociation (ETD). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that metallodrug-protein adducts were analyzed for the metal-binding site by ETD-MS/MS, which outperformed both CID and HCD in terms of number of identified metallated peptide fragments in the mass spectra and the localization of the binding sites. Only ETD allowed the simultaneous and exact determination of Met1 and His68 residues as binding partners for oxaliplatin. CID-MS/MS experiments were carried out on orbitrap and ion cyclotron resonance (ICR)-FT mass spectrometers and both instruments yielded similar results with respect to number of metallated fragments and the localization of the binding sites. A comparison of the protein secondary structure with the intensities of peptide fragments generated by collisional activation of the [Ub + Pt-(chxn)] adduct [chxn = (1R,2R)-cyclohexanediamine] revealed a correlation with cleavages in solution phase random coil areas, indicating that the N-terminal beta-hairpin and alpha-helix structures are retained in the gas phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available