4.2 Article

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients: Compared effects of once-versus twice-daily dosing

Journal

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 571-576

Publisher

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.K06-052

Keywords

glimepiride; type 2 diabetes; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of glimepiride between once- and twice-daily dosing in type 2 diabetic patients. Eight Japanese type 2 diabetic patients, who had been treated with 2 mg glimepiride alone over 4 weeks (age 40-70, body mass index <= 25 kg/m(2), hemoglobin A(1C)< 8.0%), were randomly assigned to the crossover study with glimepiride 2 mg once-daily and I mg twice-daily for 4 weeks for each regime. Serum concentrations of glimepiride, plasma glucose, insulin and C-peptide were measured over 24 h at the fixed time intervals on the last day of each crossover period, and HbA(1C) was measured at the same day. Pharmacokinetic profiles in two regimens were different to each others; a single peak of serum glimepiride concentration was observed in once-daily, and double peaks in twice-daily dosing. Drug concentration increased immediately, and peaked at 2 h after administration irrespective of dosage. C-max value in once-daily dose was higher than those in twice-daily doses. AUC values were not different between two regimens. Pharmacodynamic profiles for plasma glucoses, serum insulin and C-peptide showed no statistically significant differences between two regimens, and parameters were not different each other. Analyses of adverse events and laboratory data demonstrated a favorable safety profile of glimepiride. The present results suggest that glimepiride may be suitable for once-daily dosing with respect to clinical usefulness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available