4.7 Article

Quality assurance and quality control for thermal/optical analysis of aerosol samples for organic and elemental carbon

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 401, Issue 10, Pages 3141-3152

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5103-3

Keywords

Thermal/optical carbon analysis; IMPROVE_A protocol; Aerosol; Organic carbon; Elemental carbon; Pyrolysis; Quality assurance; Quality control

Funding

  1. National Park Service IMPROVE Carbon Analysis [C2350000894]
  2. US Environmental Protection Agency STAR [RD-83108601-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate, precise, and valid organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC, respectively) measurements require more effort than the routine analysis of ambient aerosol and source samples. This paper documents the quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) procedures that should be implemented to ensure consistency of OC and EC measurements. Prior to field sampling, the appropriate filter substrate must be selected and tested for sampling effectiveness. Unexposed filters are pre-fired to remove contaminants and acceptance tested. After sampling, filters must be stored in the laboratory in clean, labeled containers under refrigeration (< 4 A degrees C) to minimize loss of semi-volatile OC. QA activities include participation in laboratory accreditation programs, external system audits, and interlaboratory comparisons. For thermal/optical carbon analyses, periodic QC tests include calibration of the flame ionization detector with different types of carbon standards, thermogram inspection, replicate analyses, quantification of trace oxygen concentrations (< 100 ppmv) in the helium atmosphere, and calibration of the sample temperature sensor. These established QA/QC procedures are applicable to aerosol sampling and analysis for carbon and other chemical components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available