4.7 Review

Fluorescent hybridization probes for nucleic acid detection

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 402, Issue 10, Pages 3115-3125

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5526-x

Keywords

Molecular beacon; Binary probes; Fluorescence; FRET; Oligonucleotide; Signal-to-noise ratio

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01NS060762]
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF-CHE 07-17518]
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1111392] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to their high sensitivity and selectivity, minimum interference with living biological systems, and ease of design and synthesis, fluorescent hybridization probes have been widely used to detect nucleic acids both in vivo and in vitro. Molecular beacons (MBs) and binary probes (BPs) are two very important hybridization probes that are designed based on well-established photophysical principles. These probes have shown particular applicability in a variety of studies, such as mRNA tracking, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) monitoring, and microorganism identification. Molecular beacons are hairpin oligonucleotide probes that present distinctive fluorescent signatures in the presence and absence of their target. Binary probes consist of two fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide strands that can hybridize to adjacent regions of their target and generate distinctive fluorescence signals. These probes have been extensively studied and modified for different applications by modulating their structures or using various combinations of fluorophores, excimer-forming molecules, and metal complexes. This review describes the applicability and advantages of various hybridization probes that utilize novel and creative design to enhance their target detection sensitivity and specificity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available