4.2 Article

A neural network-based ionospheric model for the auroral zone

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 1459-1470

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2007.05.003

Keywords

neural networks; D-region ionosphere; auroral zone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new empirical model for the lower ionosphere in the auroral zone, called IMAZ, has been developed, tested and refined for use in the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) global model. Available ionospheric data have been used to train neural networks (NNs) to predict the high latitude electron density profile. Data from the European Incoherent Scatter Radar (EISCAT), based near Tromso, Norway (69.58 degrees N, 19.23 degrees E), combined with rocket-borne measurements (from 61 degrees to 69 degrees geomagnetic latitude) make up the database of reliable D- and E-region data. NNs were trained with different combinations of the following input parameters: day number, time of day, total absorption, local magnetic K index, planetary Ap index, 10.7 cm solar radio flux, solar zenith angle and pressure surface. The output that the NNs were trained to predict was the electron density for a given set of input parameters. The criteria for determining tile optimum NN are (a) the root mean square (RMS) error between the measured and predicted output values, and (b) the ability to reproduce the absorption they are meant to represent. An optimum input space was determined and then adapted to suit the requirements of the IRI community. In addition, the true quiet electron densities were simulated and added to the database, thus allowing the final model to be valid for riometer absorptions down to 0 dB. This paper discusses the development of a NN-based model for the high-latitude, lower ionosphere, and presents results from the version developed specifically for the I RI user community. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available