4.7 Article

Frontostriatal dysfunction in Williams syndrome

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 256-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.041

Keywords

fMRI; Go/NoGo; prefrontal cortex; response inhibition; striaturn; Williams syndrome

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD31715, HD40761, P01 HD033113, HD33113] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [MH50047, MH01142] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Williams syndrome (WS) has provided researchers with an exciting opportunity to understand the complex interplay among genes, neurobiological and cognitive functions. However, despite a well-characterized cognitive and behavioral phenotype, little attention has been paid to the marked deficits in social and behavioral inhibition. Here we explore the neural systems that mediate response inhibition in WS. Methods: We used functional MRI (fMRI) to obtain blood oxygenation level dependence (BOLD) signal maps during the performance of a Go/NoGo response inhibition task from 11 clinically and genetically diagnosed WS patients and 11 age- and gender-matched typically developing (TD) control subjects. Correlations between behavioral, neuropsychological measures, and BOLD signal were also conducted. Results: Although TD control subjects showed significantly faster response times, no group differences in behavioral accuracy were observed. Compared with control subjects, WS participants demonstrated significantly reduced activity in the striatum, dorsolateral prefrontal, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortices. These findings support the hypothesis that persons with WS fail to activate critical cortical and subcortical structures involved in behavioral inhibition. Conclusions: Our results provide important evidence for reduced engagement of the frontostriatal circuits in WS and provide putative biological markers for the deficits in response inhibition and the unusual social phenotype.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available