4.3 Article

Demographic differences between two sympatric lilies (Calochortus) with contrasting distributions, as revealed by matrix analysis

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY
Volume 191, Issue 2, Pages 265-278

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11258-006-9241-1

Keywords

Calochortus; comparative demography; dormancy; elasticity; LTRE analysis; rarity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Related species of similar morphology can differ greatly in distribution and abundance. Elucidating reasons for such differences can contribute to an understanding of intrinsic limiting factors and the causes of rarity. We studied sympatric populations of two terrestrial lilies with contrasting distributions: Calochortus lyallii, which is geographically restricted but locally abundant, and C. macrocarpus, which is widespread but locally sparse. Marked plants of each species were monitored for 5 years in British Columbia, Canada. Matrix projection models were used to estimate annual and stochastic population growth rates (lambda and lambda(s)) and to compare demographic traits. Annual lambda-values ranged from 0.89 to 1.04 in C. lyallii and from 0.89 to 1.01 in C. macrocarpus. Stochastic projections yielded a long-term growth rate near 1 for C. lyallii, but indicated a decline for C. macrocarpus. Elasticity analysis indicated that over the 5-year period of the study, survival of flowering plants made a larger proportional contribution to lambda in C. lyallii than in C. macrocarpus. LTRE analysis showed that temporal variation in lambda was driven primarily by the dynamics of flowering individuals in C. lyallii, and by the dynamics of vegetative individuals in C. macrocarpus. Similarly, higher flowering rates in C. lyallii and greater vegetative stasis in C. macrocarpus made the largest contribution to the difference in lambda between species. Thus, local persistence in these two morphologically similar species appears to be achieved via different demographic pathways. Our analyses show that extrapolations about demographic processes and population dynamics based on taxonomic relatedness, morphological similarity or habitat overlap may often not be justified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available