4.7 Article

Comparison of the efficiency of different extraction methods for the simultaneous determination of mycotoxins and pesticides in milk samples by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 399, Issue 8, Pages 2863-2875

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-4670-7

Keywords

Mycotoxins; Pesticides; Milk; Analysis; SPE; UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN-FEDER) [AGL2006-12127-C02-01, CTQ2009-07686]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AP2008-02811]
  3. SMSI-ESF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid multi-analyte method has been developed for the simultaneous determination of pesticides and mycotoxins in milk by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS). A variety of methodologies has been evaluated, including solid-phase extraction (SPE), dilute-and-shoot (liquid-liquid extraction-based procedures), and QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe)-based methods. The optimization and development process was carried out considering that the maximum residue level for aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in milk in the European Union (EU) is set at 0.05 mu g kg(-1), which is the lowest tolerance in the target compounds. The selected method consisted of an extraction by SPE using C18 as sorbent and methanol as elution solvent. The final determination was performed by UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS. Matrix-matched standard calibration was used for quantification, obtaining recoveries in the range 60-120% with relative standard deviations < 25%, at three spiking levels: 0.5, 10, and 50 mu g kg(-1) (ten times lower for AFM1). Limits of quantification ranged from 0.20 to 0.67 mu g kg(-1), which were always below or equal to the established tolerance levels by the EU. Finally, the selected method was applied to different types of milk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available