4.5 Article

Evaluation of ABT-751 against childhood cancer models in vivo

Journal

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 285-295

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-007-9042-y

Keywords

ABT-751; pediatric preclinical testing; xenogarft

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA23099, CA21765] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective ABT-751 is a novel antimitotic agent that binds tubulin at the colchicine binding site. ABT-751 is undergoing Phase I trials in children, but has not been evaluated against a range of pediatric tumor models in vivo. Materials and methods ABT-751 was evaluated against 27 subcutaneously implanted xenograft models of childhood cancer including neuroblastoma [4], osteosarcoma [4], Ewing sarcoma [2] rhabdomyosarcoma [8], medulloblastoma [1] and eight kidney cancer lines (six Wilms tumors, two rhabdoid). ABT-751 was administered at 100 mg/kg P.O. on a schedule of 5 days on, 5 days off, 5 days on, repeating the cycle at 21 days. Tumor diameters were measured at 7 day intervals for a period of 12 weeks. Three measures of antitumor activity were used: (1) clinical response criteria [e.g., partial response (PR), complete response (CR), etc.]; (2) treated to control (T/C) tumor volume at day 21; and (3) a time to event measure based on the median event free survival (EFS) of treated and control lines. Results ABT-751 induced regression in 4 of 25 models (16%) including models of neuroblastoma that are refractory to vincristine and paclitaxel. Other regressions occurred in rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor models. ABT-751 significantly increased event free survival (EFS > 2.0) in eight models (33%) in addition to those with objective responses. Conclusions ABT-751 demonstrated intermediate activity against this tumor panel. Neuroblastoma models appear somewhat more sensitive to this agent, with objective regressions also in rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor. ABT-751 was also active in several tumor lines intrinsically refractory to vincristine or paclitaxel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available