4.6 Article

Subepidermal moisture predicts erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in nursing home residents: A pilot study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
Volume 55, Issue 8, Pages 1199-1205

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01261.x

Keywords

erythema; Stage 1 pressure ulcers; moisture

Funding

  1. NINR NIH HHS [R01 NR010736] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To examine the relationship between a measure of subepidermal moisture (SEM) and visual skin assessment (VSA) of erythema and Stage 1 pressure ulcers (PUs) performed a week later in nursing home (NH) residents. Design: Descriptive, cohort study. Setting: Two NHs. Participants: Thirty-five residents. Methods: Concurrent VSAs and SEM readings were obtained at the sacrum, right and left trochanters, buttocks, and ischial tuberosities weekly for 52 weeks. SEM was measured using a handheld dermal phase meter, with higher readings indicating greater SEM (range 0-999 dermal phase units [DPUs]). VSA was rated as normal, erythema/Stage 1 PU, or Stage 2+PU. SEM was modeled as a predictor of VSA of erythema and PUs 1 week later (controlling for clustering), with concurrent moisture, Braden Scale PU risk status, anatomic site, and ethnicity as covariates. Results: Participants had a mean age of 84.7, 83% were female, and 80% were non-Hispanic white. SEM measures were lowest for normal skin (97 +/- 122 DPU), higher for erythema/Stage 1 PUs (192 188 DPU), and highest for Stage 2+PUs (569 +/- 320 DPU) across all sites (all P<.001). SEM was responsive to changes in VSA, and higher SEM predicted greater likelihood of erythema/Stage 1 PU the next week (odds ratio = 1.26 for every 100-DPU increase in SEM, P =.04). Conclusion: SEM measures are associated with concurrent erythema and PUs and future (1 week later) development of erythema/Stage 1 PUs. SEM may assist in predicting early PU damage, allowing for earlier intervention to prevent skin damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available