Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages 213-221Publisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.01.048
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- NIAMS NIH HHS [P30AR42687, K23AR02185-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: No rosacea-specific quality-of-life (QOL) instrument exists. Objective: We sought to develop a validated, reliable rosacea-specific instrument. Methods: From 6 in-depth interviews, we composed 21 rosacea-specific items. These items and Skindex-29 were administered in a validation cohort (n = 59). Internal consistency reliability and reproducibility were measured with Cronbach's coefficient alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. Responsiveness was assessed comparing baseline with 4- to 6-month responses. Construct validity was assessed with principal axes factor analyses. Discriminant validity was examined with an additional 38 patients comparing differences in responsiveness between the rosacea-specific QOL instrument and Skindex. Results: Reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha: 0.82-0.97, intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.70-0.95). The rosacea-specific QOL instrument showed preliminary responsiveness for patients with improved disease (P <= .05). Principal axes factor analyses correlated to hypothesized scales (r = 0.57-0.82). Discriminant validity was illustrated with greater differences in responsiveness using the rosacea-specific QOL instrument (P = .008). Limitations: Potential selection bias and lack of generalizability was a limitation. Conclusions: The rosacea-specific QOL instrument, RosaQoL, appears to be a reliable and valid QOL instrument and shows preliminary responsiveness for patients with improving rosacea.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available