4.5 Article

Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 1048-1062

Publisher

AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/073)

Keywords

deafness; cochlear implants; pediatrics; audiology; spoken language

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC004168-02, R01 DC004168, R01 DC004168-03, R01 DC004168-01A2, R1DC04168, R01 DC004168-04, R01 DC004168-05] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The authors examined the benefits of younger cochlear implantation, longer cochlear implant use, and greater pre-implant aided hearing to spoken language, at 3.5 and 4.5 years of age. Method: Language samples were obtained at ages 3.5 and 4.5 years from. 76 children who received an implant by their 3rd birthday. Hierarchical linear modeling was used to identify characteristics associated with spoken language outcomes at the 2 test ages. The Preschool Language Scale (I. L. Zimmerman, V. G. Steiner, & R. E. Pond, 1992) was used to compare the participants' skills with those of hearing age-mates at age 4.5 years. Results: Expected language scores increased with younger age at implant and lower pre-implant thresholds, even when compared at the same duration of implant use. Expected Preschool Language Scale scores of the children who received the implant at the youngest ages reached those of hearing age-mates by 4.5 years, but those children implanted after 24 months of age did not catch up with hearing peers. Conclusion: Children who received a cochlear implant before a substantial delay in spoken language developed (i.e., between 12 and 16 months) were more likely to achieve age-appropriate spoken language: These results favor cochlear implantation before 24 months of age, especially for children with aided pure-tone average thresholds greater than 65 dB prior to surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available