4.8 Article

Estrogen plus progestin use, microsatellite instability, and the risk of colorectal cancer in women

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 15, Pages 7534-7539

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4275

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [U01 CA074794, R01CA76366, U01CA74794] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current users of postmenopausal hormones (PMH) have similar to 30% to 40% lower risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), although associations with specific types of hormones have been inconsistent. Further, it is not clear whether some tumor types have a different risk We conducted a case-control study to examine the relationship between PMH and CRC. Cases (n = 1,004), ages 50 to 74 years, were identified from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results registry in Washington from 1998 to 2002; controls (n = 1,062) were randomly selected from population lists. Case tissue samples were obtained for microsatellite instability (MSI) analyses. Interviews collected risk-factor data for CRC, including detailed information on PMH. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Current use of any PMH was associated with a 20% reduction in CRC risk (95% CI 0.6-0.9). This reduction in risk was limited to women who had taken estrogen plus progestin (EP) preparations only (OR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9); there was no association with estrogen-only (E alone) use (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.1). For women with MSI-low or NISI-stable tumors, there was a statistically significant 40% reduction in CRC risk associated with EP use (95% CI 0.4-0.9); there was no clear association with MSI-high tumors. EP use was associated with a decreased risk of CRC; however, there seemed to be no association with E alone data that are consistent with the recent Women's Health Initiative findings. Progestin may enhance the estrogenic effect of conjugated estrogen so the combination may he more biologically active in the colon than E alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available