4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Mathematical skill in individuals with Williams syndrome: Evidence from a standardized mathematics battery

Journal

BRAIN AND COGNITION
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 238-246

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.03.005

Keywords

Williams syndrome; mathematics; number; magnitude representation; spatial representation; developmental disorder

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [F32 HD42346, F32 HD042346-03, F32 HD042346-02, F32 HD042346, F32 HD042346-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS050876-03, R01 NS050876-01A1, R01 NS050876-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Williams syndrome (WS) is a developmental disorder associated with relatively spared verbal skills and severe visuospatial deficits. It has also been reported that individuals with WS are impaired at mathematics. We examined mathematical skills in persons with WS using the second edition of the Test of Early Mathematical Ability (TEMA-2), which measures a wide range of skills. We administered the TEMA-2 to 14 individuals with WS and 14 children matched individually for mental-age on the matrices subtest of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. There were no differences between groups on the overall scores on the TEMA-2. However, an item-by-item analysis revealed group differences. Participants with WS performed more poorly than controls when reporting which of two numbers was closest to a target number, a task thought to utilize a mental number line subserved by the parietal lobe, consistent with previous evidence showing parietal abnormalities in people with WS. In contrast, people with WS performed better than the control group at reading numbers, suggesting that verbal math skills may be comparatively strong in WS. These findings add to evidence that components of mathematical knowledge may be differentially damaged in developmental disorders. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available