4.7 Article

Determination of phenylenediamine isomers in hair dyes by coal cinders micro-column extraction and MEKC

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 400, Issue 7, Pages 2141-2147

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-4932-4

Keywords

Coal cinders micro-column extraction; Hair dye; MEKC; Phenylenediamine isomers

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [20975031, 21075030]
  2. Education Committee of Hubei Province [Q20102506]
  3. Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Biology and Medicine (Wuhan University), Ministry of Education [ACBM2010004]
  4. Hubei Education Department of China [T201007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC) method using beta-cyclodextrins (beta-CDs) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphates (ionic liquids) as additives was successfully developed for determination of para-, meta-, and ortho-phenylenediamines isomers (p-P, m-P, and o-P) in hair dyes. To improve the sensitivity of the MEKC-UV, a simple and cheap flow injection (FI) technique using a micro-column packed with coal cinders (the by-products from combustion in a boiler) as solid-phase extractant was also investigated. In the presence of 20 mmol L-1 phosphates at pH 5.5, addition of 12 mmol L-1 ionic liquids and 8 mmol L-1 beta-CDs greatly improved the separation efficiency. The three analytes could be quantitatively adsorbed by coal cinders, and desorbed readily with 0.15 mL of 0.01 mol L-1 NaOH. Under the optimum conditions, an enrichment factor (EF) of 33.3 was obtained, and determination limits of p-P, m-P, and o-P were 1.97 x 10(-7), 0.99 x 10(-7), and 0.61 x 10(-7) mol L-1, respectively. The adsorption capacities of the coal cinders micro-column for p-P, m-P, and o-P were all 1.20 mg g(-1). The presented procedure was successfully applied to the determination of p-P, m-P, and o-P in hair dyes with satisfactory results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available