4.7 Article

Unsupervised classification of scattering mechanisms in polarimetric SAR data using fuzzy logic in entropy and alpha plane

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 45, Issue 8, Pages 2652-2664

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.897691

Keywords

fuzzy sets; radar polarimetry; target decomposition; terrain classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The eigenvalue-eigenvector-based approach for understanding the scattering mechanisms of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (POLSAR) data leads to noisy classification results due to arbitrarily fixed zone boundaries in the H/alpha plane. In this paper, a new classification scheme that can address the inherent vagueness of class boundaries in the H/alpha plane was tested in order to improve the unsupervised classification of the microwave scattering mechanism by introducing concepts related to fuzzy sets. A 2-D fuzzy membership function was developed for the fuzzification of the 2-D H/alpha plane. The proposed fuzzy H/alpha classifier is composed of three steps: fuzzification of the H/a plane, iterative refinement of membership degrees using the c-means algorithm, and defuzzification for the final decision process. The performance of this new approach for the L-band NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Airborne SAR data obtained during the PACRIM-II experiment was shown to be consistently improved. This new classification technique can be applied to POLSAR data without any a priori information. The fuzzification of the zone boundaries can be further applied to the interpretation of the POLSAR data, e.g., multifrequency classification, retrieval of bio- and geophysical parameters, etc. In order to propose another implementation of the fuzzy boundary representation, we exploited the combination of the H/alpha state space and anisotropy information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available