4.3 Article

Surface modification of RGD-Liposomes for selective drug delivery to monocytes/neutrophils in brain

Journal

CHEMICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 55, Issue 8, Pages 1192-1197

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/cpb.55.1192

Keywords

brain targeting; blood brain barrier; liposome; pharmacodynamic; RGD; ferulic acid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, RGD peptide was coupled with ferulic acid (FA) liposomes for binding to monocytes and neutrophils in peripheral blood for brain targeting in response to leukocyte recruitment. Cholesterol (Ch) was esterified with succinic anhydride to introduce a carboxylic end group (Ch-COOH). Soybean phosphatidylcholine, cholesterol and Ch-COOH were in a molar ratio of 1:0.23:0.05. FA was loaded into liposomes with 80.2 +/- 5.2% entrapment efficiency (EE) using a calcium acetate gradient method since it was difficult to load FA by other methods. RGD peptide was a novel compound coupled with Ch-COOH via carbodiinaide and N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide. The results of the in vitro flow cytometric study showed that RGD conjugation liposomes (RGD-liposomes) could bind to monocytes/neutrophils efficiently. The rats were subjected to intrastriatal microinjections of 100 111 of human recombinant IL-1 beta to produce brain inflammation and subsequently sacrificed after 15, 30, 60 and 120 min of administration of three formulations (FA solution, FA liposome, RGD-coated FA liposome). The body distribution results showed that RGD-liposomes could be directed to the target site, i.e. the brain, by cell selectivity in case of an inflammatory response. For RGD coated liposomes, the concentration of FA in brain was 6-fold higher than that of FA solution and 3-fold higher than that of uncoated liposomes. MTT assay and flow cytometry were used in the pharmacodynamic studies where it was found that FA liposomes exhibited greater antioxidant activity to FA solution on U937 cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available