4.7 Article

Determination of galactosamine impurities in heparin samples by multivariate regression analysis of their H-1 NMR spectra

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 399, Issue 2, Pages 635-649

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-4268-5

Keywords

Heparin; Galactosamine impurities; Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (H-1 NMR); Multivariate regression (MVR); Variable selection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heparin, a widely used anticoagulant primarily extracted from animal sources, contains varying amounts of galactosamine impurities. Currently, the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) monograph for heparin purity specifies that the weight percent of galactosamine (%Gal) may not exceed 1%. In the present study, multivariate regression (MVR) analysis of H-1 NMR spectral data obtained from heparin samples was employed to build quantitative models for the prediction of %Gal. MVR analysis was conducted using four separate methods: multiple linear regression, ridge regression, partial least squares regression, and support vector regression (SVR). Genetic algorithms and stepwise selection methods were applied for variable selection. In each case, two separate prediction models were constructed: a global model based on dataset A which contained the full range (0-10%) of galactosamine in the samples and a local model based on the subset dataset B for which the galactosamine level (0-2%) spanned the 1% USP limit. All four regression methods performed equally well for dataset A with low prediction errors under optimal conditions, whereas SVR was clearly superior among the four methods for dataset B. The results from this study show that H-1 NMR spectroscopy, already a USP requirement for the screening of contaminants in heparin, may offer utility as a rapid method for quantitative determination of %Gal in heparin samples when used in conjunction with MVR approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available