4.6 Article

Preconception B-vitamin and homocysteine status, conception, and early pregnancy loss

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 3, Pages 304-312

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm078

Keywords

China; chorionic gonadatropin; folic acid; homocysteine; nutritional status; pregnancy outcome; vitamin B 6; vitamin B 12

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-225-25-2001] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD41702, R01 HD32505] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [P01 ES06198, R01 ES11682, K01 ES12052, R01 ES08337] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Maternal vitamin status contributes to clinical spontaneous abortion, but the role of B-vitamin and homocysteine status in subclinical early pregnancy loss is unknown. Three-hundred sixty-four textile workers from Anqing, China, who conceived at least once during prospective observation (1996-1998), provided daily urine specimens for up to 1 year, and urinary human chorionic gonadatropin was assayed to detect conception and early pregnancy loss. Homocysteine, folate, and vitamins B-6 and B-12 Were measured in preconception plasma. Relative to women in the lowest quartile of vitamin B6, those in the third and fourth quartiles had higher adjusted proportional hazard ratios of conception (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 3.4; HR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.3, respectively), and the adjusted odds ratio for early pregnancy loss in conceptive cycles was lower in the fourth quartile (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3, 1.0). Women with sufficient vitamin B6 had a higher adjusted hazard ratio of conception (HR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 1.9) and a lower adjusted odds ratio of early pregnancy loss in conceptive cycles (odds ratio = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.1) than did women with vitamin B6 deficiency. Poor vitamin B6 status appears to decrease the probability of conception and to contribute to the risk of early pregnancy loss in this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available