Journal
EUROPEAN POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 3113-3127Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.011
Keywords
nanocomposites; immobilized layer; rigid amorphous fraction (RAF); PMMA; glass transition; calorimetry (DSC)
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
For semicrystalline polymers there is an ongoing debate at what temperature the immobilized or rigid amorphous fraction (RAF) devitrifies (relaxes). The question if the polymer crystals are melting first and simultaneously the RAF devitrifies or the RAF devitrifies first and later on the crystals melt cannot be answered easily on the example of semicrystalline polymers. This is because the crystals, which are the reason for the immobilization of the polymer, often disappear (melt) in the same temperature range as the RAF. For polymer nanocomposites the situation is simpler. Silica nanoparticles do not melt or undergo other phase transitions altering the polymer nanoparticle interaction in the temperature range where the polymer is thermally stable (does not degrade). The existence of an immobilized fraction in PMMA SiO2 nanocomposites was shown on the basis of heat capacity measurements at the glass transition of the polymer. The results were verified by enthalpy relaxation experiments below the glass transition. The immobilized layer is about 2 nm thick at low filler content if agglomeration is not dominant. The thickness of the layer is similar to that found in semicrystalline polymers and independent from the shape of the nanoparticles. Nanocomposites therefore offer a unique opportunity to study the devitrification of the immobilized fraction (RAF) without interference of melting of crystals as in semicrystalline polymers. It was found that the interaction between the SiO2 nanoparticles and the PMMA is so strong that no devitrification occurs before degradation of the polymer. No gradual increase of heat capacity or a broadening of the glass transition was found. The cooperatively rearranging regions (CRR) are either immobilized or mobile. No intermediate states are found. The results obtained for the polymer nanocomposites support the view that the reason for the restricted mobility must disappear before the RAF can devitrify. For semicrystalline polymers this means that rigid crystals must melt before the RAF can relax. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available