4.7 Article

Regulation of endothelial barrier function during flow-induced conversion to an arterial phenotype

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 596-607

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.017

Keywords

VE-cadherin; actin; Rho-GTPases; cell junction; permeabbility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Flow-induced conversion of endothelial cells into an elongated arterial phenotype requires a coordinated regulation of cell junctions. Here we investigated the effect of acute and chronic flow on junction regulation. Methods and results: Using an extended experimental setup that allows analyses of endothelial barrier function under flow conditions, we found a flow-induced upregulation of the transendothelial electrical resistance within minutes. This was accompanied by an increase in actin filaments along the junctions and vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin clustering, which was identified at nanoscale resolution by stimulated emission depletion microscopy. In addition, a transient tyrosine phosphorylation of VE-cadherin and catenins occurred within minutes following the onset of flow. VE-cadherin and actin distribution were maintained under chronic flow over 24 h and associated with the upregulation of VE-cadberin and alpha-catenin expression, thus compensating for the cell elongation-mediated increase in cell border length. Importantly, all observed effects were racl dependent as verified by the inhibitory effect of dominant negative N17rac1. Conclusion: These results show that flow-induced conversion of endothelial cells into an arterial phenotype occurs while intercellular junctions remain intact. The data place racl in a central multimodal regulatory position that might be important in the development of vascular diseases, such as arteriosclerosis. (c) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available