4.7 Article

A transient isotopic labeling methodology for 13C metabolic flux analysis of photo auto trophic microorganisms

Journal

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
Volume 68, Issue 16-18, Pages 2302-2312

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.03.042

Keywords

synechocystis sp PCC 6803; transient C-13-MFA; photosynthesis; modeling; calvin cycle; instationary C-13-MFA

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R33 DK070290-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolic flux analysis is increasingly recognized as an integral component of systems biology. However, techniques for experimental measurement of system-wide metabolic fluxes in purely photoautotrophic systems (growing on CO2 as the sole carbon source) have not yet been developed due to the unique problems posed by such systems. In this paper, we demonstrate that an approach that balances positional isotopic distributions transiently is the only route to obtaining system-wide metabolic flux maps for purely autotrophic metabolism. The outlined transient C-13-MFA methodology enables measurement of fluxes at a metabolic steady-state, while following changes in C-13-labeling patterns of metabolic intermediates as a function of time, in response to a step-change in C-13-label input. We use mathematical modeling of the transient isotopic labeling patterns of central intermediates to assess various experimental requirements for photoautotrophic MFA. This includes the need for intracellular metabolite concentration measurements and isotopic labeling measurements as a function of time. We also discuss photobioreactor design and operation in order to measure fluxes under precise environmental conditions. The transient MFA technique can be used to measure and compare fluxes under different conditions of light intensity, nitrogen sources or compare strains with various mutations or gene deletions and additions. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available