4.3 Article

Loading characteristics of females exhibiting excessive valgus moments during cutting

Journal

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 827-833

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.04.003

Keywords

ACL; hip; kinematics; ground reaction forces

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Excessive knee valgus moments are considered a risk factor for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes, however, little is known about the biomechanical factors that contribute to this loading pattern. The purpose of this study was to compare lower extremity kinematics, foot position and ground reaction forces between female soccer players who demonstrate normal frontal plane moments at the knee with those who demonstrate excessive frontal plane moments at the knee during a cutting maneuver. Methods. Sixty-one female soccer players, 16 (2) years, participated. Three dimensional kinematics and ground reaction forces were recorded during a side-step cutting maneuver. Knee frontal plane moments were calculated with inverse dynamics equations and were used to classify subjects into normal (N = 38) and excessive valgus moment (N = 23) groups. Findings. Data revealed that the subjects with excessive valgus moments demonstrated an initial loading pattern that included greater laterally directed ground reaction forces (P < 0.001, effect size 1.51), increased hip abduction (P = 0.002, effect size 0.79), increased hip internal rotation (P = 0.008, effect size 0.71) and a more internally rotated foot progression angle (P = 0.04, effect size 0.55). Taken together, these variables explained 49% of the variance in peak knee valgus moment (R =.698, P < 0.001). Interpretation. These results provide insight into potentially injurious loading strategies and support the premise that interventions designed to encourage loading of the lower extremity in a more neutral alignment may work to decrease frontal plane loading at the knee. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available