4.7 Article

Fluorescence polarization immunoassay for rapid screening of ochratoxin A in red wine

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 395, Issue 5, Pages 1317-1323

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2994-3

Keywords

Ochratoxin A; Fluorescence polarization immunoassay; Solid-phase extraction; Wine; Rapid methods

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, MIUR
  2. Italian National Research Council (CNR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fluorescence polarization (FP) immunoassay, based on a monoclonal antibody and an ochratoxin A (OTA)-fluorescein tracer, has been developed for rapid screening of OTA in red wine. Wine samples were diluted with methanol and passed through aminopropyl solid-phase extraction columns prior to the FP assay. Average recoveries from samples spiked with OTA at levels of 2.0 and 5.0 ng/mL were 79% with RDS of 11% (n = 6). The limit of detection of the FP immunoassay was 0.7 ng/mL OTA, and the whole analysis was performed in less than 10 min. The assay was tested on 154 red wine samples (naturally contaminated or spiked at level ranging from 0.1 to 5.0 ng/mL) and compared with an high-performance liquid chromatography/immunoaffinity column clean-up method, showing a good correlation (r = 0.9222). Their compliance with the European regulation (2.0 ng/mL OTA maximum permitted level) was correctly assessed for 70% of the analyzed samples of red wine, whereas confirmatory analyses were required for the remaining ones with OTA levels close to the regulatory limit. No false-negative or positive results were observed using the FP immunoassay. The proposed FP assay is a useful screening method for OTA in red wines, when high throughput is required, that could also be used for white and ros, wines, which are known to contain less interfering compounds such as polyphenols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available