4.6 Article

Aeroallergen sensitization in healthy children: Racial and socioeconomic correlates

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 151, Issue 2, Pages 187-191

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.03.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI046652, R01 AI046652-01A1, R01AI46652-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD043005, T32 HD043005-03, T32 HD43005] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [T32 ES010957, T32 ES010957-04, T32 ES010957-03, T32 ES10957] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Allergic sensitization is very prevalent and often precedes the development of allergic disease. This study examined the association of race with allergic sensitization among healthy children with no family history of atopy. Study design Two hundred seventy-five children, predominantly from lower socioeconomic strata, from Cincinnati, Ohio, ages 2 to IS years without a family or personal history of allergic diseases, underwent shin pirick testing to 11 allergen panels. The Pediatric Allergic Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PADQLQ) was used to examine the impact of sensitization on quality of life. Results Thirty-nine percent of healthy children were sensitized to I or more allergen panels. Multivariate logistic regression showed increased risk among African-American children for any sensitization (OR, 2.17; [95% Cl: 1.23, 3.84]) and sensitization to any outdoor allergen (OR, 2.96 [95% Cl: 1.52, 5.741). Eighty-six percent of children had PADQLQ scores of I or less (0 to 6 scale). Conclusions Allergic sensitization is prevalent even among children who do not have a personal or family history of asthma, allergic rhinitis, or atopic dermatitis and who have no evidence of current, even subtle effects from this sensitization on allergic disease-related quality of life. African -American children are at greater risk for presence of sensitization, especially to outdoor allergens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available