4.3 Article

Threshold-like pattern of neuronal activation in the hypothalamus during treadmill running: Establishment of a minimum running stress (MRS) rat model

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages 341-348

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2007.04.004

Keywords

running stress; hypothalamus; treadmill running; lactate threshold; ACTH; hormesis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the indication that the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is activated during treadmill running, there have not been any studies focusing on the relationship between exercise intensity and region-specific neural activities in hypothalamus. To address this, rats were subjected to 30 min of running, either at middle (supra-LT, 25 m min-(1)) or low speeds (sub-LT, 15 m min(-1)), and c-Fos-(+) cells were counted and compared with control rats. Significant increases in blood glucose and lactate levels, and plasma ACTH and osmolality levels were observed during supra-LT running. Only supra-LT running significantly increased c-Fos induction in various hypothalamic regions, namely, the medial preoptic area (MPO), periventricular nucleus (Pe), suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), supraoptic nucleus (SON), parvocellular division of the paraventricular nucleus (pPVN), anterior hypothalamic area (AH), arcuate nucleus (ARC) and posterior hypothalamic nucleus (PH). However, sub-LT caused no effect on c-Fos accumulation. This indicates that the hypothalamus responds uniquely to running in a threshold-like pattern distinct from the speeddependent pattern previously reported for the medulla oblongata [Ohiwa et al., 2006a,b]. In addition, these results showed a physiologic basis for mild exercise useful for establishing our minimum running stress (MRS) rat model, or the running conditions that minimize the activation of the HPA axis. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd and the Japan Neuroscience Society. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available