4.5 Article

Non-synonymous polymorphisms in melanocortin-4 receptor protect against obesity: the two facets of a Janus obesity gene

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages 1837-1844

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddm132

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [G0600331] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0600331] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600331] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene pathogenic mutations are the most prevalent forms of monogenic obesity, responsible for similar to 2% of obesity cases, but its role in common obesity is still elusive. We analyzed the contribution of non-synonymous mutations V1031 (rs2229616, c.307G > A) and I251L (no rs, c.751A > C) to obesity in 16 797 individuals of European origin from nine independent case-control, population-based and familial cohorts. We observed a consistent negative association of I251L variant (prevalence ranging 0.41-1.21%) with both childhood and adult class III obesity [odds ratio (OR) ranging from 0.25 to 0.76, 0.001 < P-value < 0.05] and with modulation of body mass index (BMI) in general populations, in eight out of nine studies, whereas only one study showed an association between V1031 and BMI. Meta-analyses of previous published data with the current ones provided strong evidence of the protective effect of I251L toward obesity (OR = 0.52, P = 3.58 10-5), together with a modest negative association between V1031 and obesity (OR = 0.80, P = 0.002). Taken together, gain-of-function mutations 1251 L and V1031 may be responsible for a preventive fraction of obesity of 2%, which mirrors the prevalence of monogenic obesity due to MC4R haploinsufficiency. These results also emphasize the importance of the MC4R signalling tonus to prevent obesity, even in the context of our current obesogenic environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available