4.5 Article

Reduced intensity conditioning in unrelated donor transplantation for refractory cytopenia in childhood

Journal

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages 329-333

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705730

Keywords

refractory cytopenia; reduced intensity conditioning regimen; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; transplant-related complications; children

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous group of acquired hematopoietic stem cell disorders. Refractory cytopenia ( RC) is the most common subtype of childhood MDS and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment. HSCT following a myeloablative preparative regimen is associated with a low probability of relapse and considerable transplant-related mortality. In the present European Working Groups of MDS pilot study, we investigated whether a reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) is able to offer reduced toxicity without increased rates of graft failure or relapse. Nineteen children with RC were transplanted from an unrelated donor following RIC consisting of fludarabine, thiotepa and anti-thymocyte globulin. Three patients experienced graft failure. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment occurred at a median time of 23 and 30 days, respectively. Cumulative incidence of grade II-IV and grade III and IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 0.48 and 0.13, respectively; three patients developed extensive chronic GVHD. Although infections were the predominant complications, only one patient with extensive chronic GVHD died from infectious complications. Overall and event-free survival at 3 years were 0.84 and 0.74, respectively. In conclusion, our results were comparable to those of patients treated with myeloablative HSCT. Long-term follow-up is needed to demonstrate the expected reduction in long-term sequelae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available