4.7 Article

Transmission electron microscopy characterization of colloidal copper nanoparticles and their chemical reactivity

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 396, Issue 3, Pages 1057-1069

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-3203-0

Keywords

Copper nanoparticles; Copper oxide nanoparticles; Copper sulfide nanoplates; Kirkendall effect; Nanoplates; Transmission electron microscopy

Funding

  1. Maryland NanoCenter and its NispLab
  2. NSF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A colloidal synthesis method was developed to produce face centered cubic (fcc) Cu nanoparticles in the presence of surfactants in an organic solvent under an Ar environment. Various synthetic conditions were explored to control the size of the as-prepared nanoparticles by changing the precursor, varying the amount of surfactants, and tuning the reaction temperature. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected-area electron diffraction, and high-resolution TEM were used as the main characterization tools. Upon exposure to air, these nanoparticles are oxidized at different levels depending on their sizes: ( 1) an inhomogeneous layer of fcc Cu2O forms at the surface of Cu nanoparticles ( about 30 nm); ( 2) Cu nanoparticles ( about 5 nm) are immediately oxidized into fcc Cu2O nanoparticles ( about 6 nm). The occurrence of these different levels of oxidization demonstrates the reactive nature of Cu nanoparticles and the effect of size on their reactivity. Furthermore, utilization of their chemical reactivity and conversion of spherical Cu nanoparticles into CuS nanoplates through the nanoscale Kirkendall effect were demonstrated. The oxidization and sulfidation of Cu nanoparticles were compared. Different diffusion and growth behaviors were involved in these two chemical transformations, resulting in the formation of isotropic Cu2O nanoparticles during oxidization and anisotropic CuS nanoplates during sulfidation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available